Home > Hospital Administrators > Clinical Validation > Bibliography

Bibliography

 

Alternative technologies to the robot to improve outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Poster. Julio M. Pow-Sang, Alejandro Rodriguez. World Congress of EndoUrology September 2006 Cleveland, OH. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa, Florida, USA.

 

Three-dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System. Bhayani SB, Andriole GL. Reviews in Urology. Fall 2005. Volume 7, No. 4: 211-215.

 

Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic 3D visualization? A validated assessment.

Poster. Patel H, Joseph JV. European Association of Urology 2006 Annual Congress, March 2006 Paris, France. 1University College Hospitals Foundation Trust, Institute of Urology, London, United Kingdom, 2University of Rochester, NY, US.

 

The Effect of Depth Perception on Visual-Motor Compensation in Minimal Invasive Surgery.  Nicolaou M, Atallah L,James A, Leong J, Darzi A, Yang GZ. MIAR 2006, LNCS 4091, PPg. 156-163, 2006.

 

Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Wauben LS, van Veelen MA, Gossot D, Goossens RH. Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1268-74.

 

Advantages of 3D visual effects in laparoscopic surgery. van Velthoven R. Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M.Available at http://www.websurg. com/editorial/ 3D_visual_effects_in_ laparoscopic_surgery.php. J Endourol. 2005 Dec; 19(10):1212-5. Accessed August 2006.

 

Comparative study of various 2-D and 3-D vision systems in minimally invasive surgery. Buess GF, van Bergen P, Kunert W, Schurr MO. Chirurg. 1996 Oct;67(10):1041-6.

 

The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision

of novices and experienced surgeons. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC,

Darzi A. Surg Endosc. 1999 Nov; 13(11):1087-92.

 

Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Morino M., Pellegrino L, Giaccone C., Garrone C., Rebecchi F. British Journal of Surgery. Volume 93, Issue 5 (May 2006):553-558.

 

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? Bandani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M. J Endourol. 2005 Dec; 19(10):1212-5.

 

Cost comparison of laproscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Anderson JK, Murdock A, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y. Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):557-60.

 

Urology—Pros and Cons of Robot-Assisted Surgery. "Laparoscopic Prostatectomy."

Smith A. American Urological Association press briefing. 2005 May.

 

What have we learnt after two years working with the da Vinci robot system in digestive surgery? Hubens G, Ruppert M, Balliu L, Vaneerdeweg W. Acta Chir Belg. 2004 Nov-Dec;104(6):609-14.

 

Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy.

Jourdan IC, Dutson E, Garcia A, Vleugels T, Leroy J, Mutter D, Marescaux J. BR J Surg. 2004 Jul; 91(7)879-85.

 

Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective. Lanfanco AR, Castellanos R AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Ann Surg. 2004 Jan; 239(1):14-21. Review.



 

Ergonomics in Surgery. Van Veellen M, Goossens R. Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology. Delft, Netherlands.